Author(s)

Min Hou ¹, Cancan Li ¹, Chunmei Gu ¹, Xue Zhang ²

Affiliation(s)

¹ Business Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
² School of Foreign Languages, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, China

Corresponding Author

Xue Zhang

ABSTRACT

"Online courses" avoid the limitation of time and space and effectively integrate educational resources by using internet technology, thus accelerating the development of modern education. The wide use of online courses since the COVID-19 pandemic has made the learning effect of online courses and its influencing factors attract the attention of educators and educational researchers. Based on the Transactional Distance Theory, this paper constructed a model of factors influencing the learning effect of online courses in higher education. We collected sample data of 743 participants in online courses and evaluated the learning effect of online courses through structural equations. The results show that: (1) material content utility and interaction utility of online courses have a significant positive effect on the learning effect and course satisfaction evaluation; further, attention has a mediating effect on the learning effect; (2) Compared with "live broadcast" courses, the effect of material content and interaction on learning effect is stronger in "live broadcast + recording" courses; (3) differences in students' characteristics result in different learning effects. The conclusion of this study provides a theoretical basis for improving the learning effect of online teaching and a reference for formulating targeted incentive strategies based on students’ characteristics.

KEYWORDS

Transactional Distance Theory; Learning effect; Temperament type; Online courses

CITE THIS PAPER

Min Hou, Cancan Li, Chunmei Gu, Xue Zhang, The mechanism of learning effect of online courses in higher-education: An explanation based on the interactive distance theory. Adult and Higher Education (2022) Vol. 4: 6-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2022.041402.

REFERENCES

[1] Huang, L., Pei, X., Zhu, Y. (2020) A New Approach to the Evaluation Index System of Online Course Content Quality: From the Perspective of Learner Experience and Knowledge Payment. Journal of Distance Education, (01), 104-112.
[2] Yan, Q., Liu, R., Wang, Y. (2020) Design of Online and Offline Hybrid Teaching System Based on Network Information Technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574(1), 012142 (8pp).
[3] Weissmann, Y., Useini, M., Goldhahn, J. (2021) COVID-19 as a Chance for Hybrid Teaching Concepts. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 38(1). doi: 10.3205/zma001408
[4] Xiao, X. (2021) Exploration and Practice of Online-Offline Blended Teaching in College English Courses. Open Access Library Journal, 8(6), 1-9.
[5] Kim, D., et al. (2021) Exploring the structural relationships between course design factors, learner commitment, self-directed learning, and intentions for further learning in a self-paced MOOC. Computers & Education, 166, 104171.
[6] Li, S., Sun, Z., Luo, L. (2021) Differences in Learning Effects among Teachers Who Participate in Individual and in Groups in a MOOC. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(4), 184-188.
[7] Pande, J., Mythili, G. (2021) Investigating Student Satisfaction with Online Courses: A Case Study of Uttarakhand Open University. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(3), 12-28.
[8] Moore, M. G. (1972) Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76.
[9] Moore, M. G. (1997) Distance Education: a System View. Computers & Education, 29(4), 209-211.
[10] Chen, Y. J. (2001) Dimensions of Transactional Distance in the World Wide Web Learning Environment: a Factor Analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 459-470.
[11] Moore, M. G. (1993) Theory of Transactional Distance. Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, 22-38. Routledge, New York.
[12] Hew, K. F., et al. (2020) What Predicts Student Satisfaction with MOOCs: A Gradient Boosting Trees Supervised Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis Approach. Computers & Education, 145, 103724.
[13] Aldhahi, M. I., Alqahtani, A. S., Baattaiah, B. A., Al-Mohammed, H. I. (2021) Exploring the Relationship between Students' Learning Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy During the Emergency Transition to Remote Learning Amid the Coronavirus Pandemic: a Cross-Sectional Study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18.
[14] Schmidt R A, Lee T D, Winstein C, et al. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Human Kinetics, 2018.
[15] Wang, W. (2020) An Analysis of The Factors Influencing the Interaction Between Teachers and Students in College English Class and The Countermeasures. International Journal of Education and Economics, 3(3), 218-219.
[16] Holmberg, B. (2005) Theory and Practice of Distance Education. Routledge, 469-472.
[17] Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. H., Hsu, Y. C. (2018) Online Course Design in Higher Education: A Review of National and Statewide Evaluation Instruments. TechTrends, 62(1), 46-57.
[18] Pittman Jr, V. V. (1987) The Persistence of Print: Correspondence Study and the New Media. American Journal of Distance Education, 1(1), 31-36.
[19] Holmberg, B. (1986) A discipline of distance education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 1(1): 25-40.
[20] Liu, B., Zhang, W. (2017) Study on the Influencing Factors and Structure of Online Course Learning Experience. Modern Educational Technology (Chinese), 27(9), 107-113.
[21] Baars, M., Leopold, C., Paas, F. (2018) Self-explaining Steps in Problem-Solving Tasks to Improve Self-Regulation in Secondary Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 578.
[22] Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A. (2012) Overconfidence Produces Underachievement: Inaccurate Self Evaluations Undermine Students’ Learning and Retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271-280.
[23] Sun, P. C., et al. (2008) What Drives a Successful E-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
[24] Yukselturk, E. (2009) Do Entry Characteristics of Online Learners Affect Their Satisfaction? International Journal on E-Learning, 8(2), 263-281.
[25] Li, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, H. (2020) Model Construction and Empirical Test of College Students' Online Learning Satisfaction During Epidemic: Based on a Survey of 15 Universities in Shanghai. Open Education Research, 26(4), 102-111.
[26] Estelami, H. (2012) An Exploratory Study of The Drivers of Student Satisfaction and Learning Experience in Hybrid-Online and Purely Online Marketing Courses. Marketing Education Review, 22(2), 143-156.
[27] Wang, W., Li, W. (2020) Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Online Learning Experience of Chinese College Students: An Analysis Based On Survey Data of 334 Universities in China. Open Education Research (Chinese), 26 (06):89-99.
[28] Pingault, J. B., et al. (2011) Childhood Trajectories of Inattention and Hyperactivity and Prediction of Educational Attainment in Early Adulthood: a 16-Year Longitudinal Population-Based Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(11), 1164-1170.
[29] Xia, J., Deng, J., Xiang, Y. (2020) Online Learning Effect of Middle School Students During Epidemic from Multi-Dimensional Perspective: Based on 466 Students' Satisfaction Questionnaire Survey. Education Informatization in China (Chinese), (24), 18-23.
[30] Risko, E. F., et al. (2013) Everyday Attention: Mind Wandering and Computer Use during Lectures. Computers & Education, 68, 275-283.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education