Author(s)

Meimei Wu ¹, Fangfang Duan ², Zongmin Ma ³

Affiliation(s)

¹ College of Foreign Languages, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji, China
² School of Foundational Education, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China
³ School of Foreign Languages, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang, China

Corresponding Author

Fangfang Duan

ABSTRACT

Critical thinking cultivation has been regarded as one of the key objectives of tertiary education, which has drawn attention from the field of foreign language teaching in China. In contrast, the deficiency of critical thinking among English-major college students has become a heated-discussed issue in the past two decades. This study endeavored to combine two dimensions of argumentation: the nature of content and how it is organized, thus investigating the association between critical thinking skills manifested in each rhetorical move and EFL students' macro-structure of argumentative text. Both the move-structure approach based on Toulmin's model of argumentation and the text analysis approach were utilized to explore critical thinking skills manifested in each move. The findings show that participants had grasped the basic argumentative pattern (claim+ground) though lacking sufficient elaboration on evidence. But for secondary argumentative elements like counterargument and rebuttal, both quantity and quality lag the former. The most evident moves in the macro-structure of argumentative texts were introduction, claim, subclaim, ground, warrant, backing, counterargument, rebuttal, and conclusion. All in all, evaluation and inference critical thinking skills were the most evident in terms of composing a quality argumentation.

KEYWORDS

Critical thinking, argumentative writing, Toulmin's model of argumentation, argumentative moves, macro-structure of argumentation

CITE THIS PAPER

Meimei Wu, Fangfang Duan, Zongmin Ma, Macro-Structure of Argumentative Text as Manifestation of Chinese EFL Students' Critical Thinking Skills . Adult and Higher Education (2023) Vol. 5: 48-59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.050107.

REFERENCES

[1] Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
[2] Facione, P., & Facione, N. (2007). Talking critical thinking. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(2), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.2.38-45
[3] Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). A guide for educators to critical thinking competency standards: Standards, principles, performance indicators, and outcomes with a critical thinking master rubric (Vol. 8). Dillon, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
[4] Huang, Y. (1998). Absence of critical thinking. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 7(1), 19. doi:10.13458/j. cnki.flatt.001587
[5] He Q., Yin T., Huang Y., & Liu H. (1999). Certain suggestions on undergraduate education reform of foreign language major. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 24-28.
[6] Wen, Q. & Zhou, Y. (2006). Review on the development of thinking ability of foreign language majors. Foreign Languages Research, 5, 76-80.
[7] Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Bosten: D. C. Health & Co. http://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
[8] Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.
[9] Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking and the use of criteria. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 1(2), 2-2. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews19881211
[10] Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking: What every student needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Dillon Beach, CA: The New York City.
[11] Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: Forms A and B Manual. Psychological Corporation.
[12] Crammond, J. G. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15(2), 230-268. doi: 10.1177/0741088398015002004
[13] Pei, Z., Zheng, C., Zhang, M. & Liu, F. (2017). Critical thinking and argumentative writing: Inspecting the association among EFL Learners in China. English Language Teaching. 10(10), 31-42. doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n10p31
[14] Lu, D., & Xie, Y. (2019). The effects of a critical thinking oriented instructional pattern in a tertiary EFL argumentative writing course. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 969-984. doi: 10.1080/07294360. 2019.1607830
[15] Nejmaoui N. (2019). Improving EFL Learners' Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing. English Language Teaching. 12(1). 98-109. doi: 10.5539/elt.v12n1p98
[16] Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014). Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System, 45, 117-128. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. system. 2014.05.005
[17] Liu F., & Stapleton P. (2018). Connecting writing assessment with critical thinking: An exploratory study of alternative rhetorical functions and objects of enquiry in writing prompts. Assessing Writing, 38, 10-20. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.09.001
[18] Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006
[19] Liu, D., & Wan, F. (2020). What makes proficient writers' essays more persuasive? A Toulmin perspective. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(1), 13. doi:10.46451/ijts.2020.06.01
[20] Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765-793.
[21] Osman, W. H., & Januin, J. (2021). Analysing ESL Persuasive Essay Writing Using Toulmin's Model of Argument. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 1810-1821.
[22] Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
[23] McCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 62-76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171288
[24] Yeh, S. S. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 49-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171572
[25] Chuang, P. L., & Yan, X. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between argument structure and essay quality in assessed writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56, 100892. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100892
[26] Soodmand, A., Movassagh, H., & Radi Arbabi, H. (2017). The interrelationship among critical thinking, writing an argumentative essay in an L2 and their subskills. The Language Learning Journal, 45(4), 419-433. doi: 10.1080/ 09571736.2017.1320420
[27] Facione, P.A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
[28] Toulmin, S. E. (1958, 2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[29] Tardy, C. M., & Swales, J. M. (2014). Genre analysis. Pragmatics of Discourse, 3, 165.
[30] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
[31] Kennedy, M., Fisher, M., & Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: Literature review and needed research. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones, (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 11-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[32] Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of Toulmin's Model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), 143-153. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph/article/view/4856
[33] Osborne, J. (2005). The role of argument in science education. In K. Boersma et al. (eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 367-380). Netherlands: Springer.
[34] Macagno, F. (2016). Argument relevance and structure. Assessing and developing students' uses of evidence. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.002

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education