Theory of Planned Behavior as a model of limit mobile phone use while driving
DOI: 10.23977/aetp.2021.51002 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 153
1 PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Department of Psychology, University Setif 2, Setif, Algeri
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is one of the most widely used psychological models when it comes to explaining road safety behaviors. Recently, studies have also been conducted from the perspective of dual-process models. However, the present is the first study on road safety behaviors that integrates both perspectives. The study evaluates the roles of both implicit attitudes and TPB constructs in the prediction of mobile phone use while driving. Method a sample of 100 drivers completed: (1) a self-reporting instrument on Mobile phone use while driving, (2) a questionnaire addressing TPB constructs, (3) an indirect measure of attitudes (Implicit Association Test), and (4) a social desirability scale. Results suggest that both types of attitudes make a significant and quite similar contribution to the explanation of Mobile phone use while driving. Interestingly, implicit attitudes were a better predictor than explicit attitudes among participants reporting inconsistent Mobile phone use Mobile Phone while driving. In addition, path analysis models suggested that implicit attitudes appear to be relatively independent of TPB constructs and have a direct effect on Mobile phone use. Conclusion the findings advance the idea of adding implicit attitudes to variables from the TPB model in order to increase the explanatory power of models used to predict road safety behaviors.
KEYWORDSTheory of Planned Behavior (TPB); Mobile Phone While Driving (MPWD); Road Safety Behavior (RSB)
CITE THIS PAPER
S.Keffane, Theory of Planned Behavior as a model of limit mobile phone use while driving. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2021) 5: 6-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2021.51002
 Goodman, M. J., Bents, F. D., Tijerina, L., Wierwille, W., Lerner, N., & Benel, D. (1997). An investigation of the safety implications of wireless communication in vehicles. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, NHTSA. <http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/wireless/
 Lamble, D., Rajalin, S., & Summala, H. (2002). Mobile phone use while driving: public opinions on restrictions. Transportation, 29(3), 223–236. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1015698129964. http://virtual.vtt.fi/virtual/proj6/fits/impacts/Lamble_2002_Mobile_phone_use_while_driving.pdf.
 Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J.I., Ghorashi, S.S., Enns, J.T., 2005. The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychol. Res. 69 (3), 191–200.
 Visser, T.A., Bischof, W.F., Di Lollo, V., 2004. Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Percept. Psychophys. 66 (8),1418–1432.
 Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Monanaro, E., Bryan, A., Klein, W., Miles, E., & Rothman, A. (2015). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. European Health Psychologist, 17, 598. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/hea0000387.
 Wiers, R. W., Houben, K. M. P. I., Roefs, A., Jong, P., Hofmann, W., & Stacy, A. W. (2010). 710 Implicit cognition in health psychology:Why common sense goes out of the window. 711 In B. Gawronski, & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition:Measurement, 712 theory, and applications (pp. 463–488). Guilford Press.
 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
 Blair, I. V., Dasgupta, N., & Glaser, J. (2015). Implicit attitudes. In M. E. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology. Attitudes and social cognition, Vol. 1. (pp. 665–691). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14341-021.
 Sheeran, P., Bosch, J. A., Crombez, G., Hall, P. A., Harris, J. L., Papies, E. K., & Wiers, R. W. (2016). Implicit processes in health psychology: Diversity and promise. Health Psychology, 35(8), 761. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000409.
 Ronggang, Z., Changxu, W., Rau, P. L. P., & Zhang, W. (2009). Young driver’s learners intention to use a hand-held or hands-free mobile phone when driving. Transportation Research Part F, 12, 208–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.11.003.
 Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., King, M., Vaezipur, A., Truelove, V., 2019a. Can our phones keep us safe? A content analysis of smartphone applications to prevent mobile phone distracted driving. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 657–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.017.
 Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (2), 179–211.
 Gauld, C.S., Lewis, I., White, K.M., Fleiter, J.J., Watson, B., 2017. Smartphone use while driving: what factors predict young drivers’ intentions to initiate, read, and respond to social interactive technology? Comput. Human Behav. 76, 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.023.
 Walsh, S.P., White, K.M., Hyde, M.K., Watson, B., 2008. Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40 (6), 1893–1900.
 Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0015575.
 Şimşekoğlu, Ö., & Lajunen, T. (2009). Relationship of seat belt use to health and driver 688 behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(3), 689 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.001.