Concepts in Occupational Socialization Theory
DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2021.040101 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 160
Colin G. Pennington 1
1 School of Kinesiology, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas, USA
Corresponding AuthorColin G. Pennington
Occupational Socialization Theory (OST) has been a thoroughly researched topic among scholars of sport pedagogy for over 40 years (see Richards, Pennington, & Sinelnikov, 2019). The purpose of this mini-review is not to cover the extensive body of knowledge based in OST research, but to provide a brief outline on two less often mentioned concepts lying within OST; the phenomenon of dialectics and mentorship as a socializing agent. First, it is important to recognize the model of OST relying on a three-phase, time-oriented continuum for understanding the phenomenon is now outdated (Pennington, in press). The past five years there has been in increase occupational socialization theory scholars describing the socialization experiences of individuals pursuing higher degrees in physical education or seeking careers as professors of physical education teacher trainers or PETE faculty (Pennington, 2019).
KEYWORDSOccupational Socialization, Secondary Professional Socialization, Dialectics, Mentorship
CITE THIS PAPER
Colin G. Pennington, Concepts in Occupational Socialization Theory. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2021) 4: 1-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2021.040101
 Casey, A., & Fletcher, T. (2012). Trading places: From physical education teachers to teacher educators. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,31(4), 362-380.
 Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2009). Breaking the cycle of non-teaching physical education teachers: Lessons to be learned from the occupational socialization literature. In D. L. Housner, M. W. Metzler, P. G. Schempp, & T. J. Templin (Eds.). Historic traditions and future directions of research on teaching and teacher education in physical education (pp. 221-226).
 Dodds, P. (2005). PETE women’s experiences of being mentored into postsecondary faculty positions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 344–367.
 Ingersoll, R., & Kralik, J. M. (2004). The impact of mentoring on teacher retention: What the research says. Denver, CO: GSE Publication.
 Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505-532.
 Lee, H. M., & Curtner-Smith, M. (2011). Impact of occupational socialization on the perspectives and practices of sport pedagogy doctoral students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 296-313.
 Long, J. (1997). The dark side of mentoring. Australian Educational Research, 24, 115-123.
 Parker, M., Sutherland, S., Sinclair, C., & Ward, P. (2011). Not surprised, but concerned: The professoriate's reaction to PETE doctoral education in the United States. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(2), 157-177.
 Pennington, C. G. (in press). The Transition into Professorship: Beyond the Three-Phase Approach to Socialization. The Physical Educator.
 Pennington, C. G. (2019). Doctoral Students Socialized into Educators by Serving as Mentors to Undergraduate Pupils. Iowa Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance.
 Richards K. A. R. & Templin T (2016). Secondary Professional Socialization through Professional Organizations: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35, 70-75.
 Richards, K. A. R, Pennington, C. G., & Sinelnikov, O. (2019). Teacher Socialization in Physical Education: A Scoping Review of Literature. Kinesiology Review. 8(2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2018-0003.
 Schempp, P. G., & Graber, K. (1992). Teacher socialization from a dialectical perspective: Pretraining through induction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 329-348.
 Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41, 681-714.