Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Marcuse's Critical Theory of Technical Rationality

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/artpl.2023.040407 | Downloads: 41 | Views: 446

Author(s)

Li Yudi 1

Affiliation(s)

1 College of Liberal Arts, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China

Corresponding Author

Li Yudi

ABSTRACT

As a representative of the Frankfurt School, Marcuse has repeatedly discussed the relationship between technology and freedom. He attributes human alienation to the fact that technological rationality has become a covered ideology in developed industrial society, thus making people lose negativity, transcendence and criticism, and then become 'one-dimensional people '. This paper takes Marcuse's "comfortable non-freedom" as the starting point, and discusses Marcuse's critical theory of technical rationality from three aspects: loss of freedom, paralysis of freedom and return to freedom. It further analyzes how Marcuse reshapes subject freedom and achieves social liberation from the perspective of aesthetics and art.

KEYWORDS

Freedom, marcuse, technical rationality

CITE THIS PAPER

Li Yudi, Marcuse's Critical Theory of Technical Rationality. Art and Performance Letters (2023) Vol. 4: 35-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040407.

REFERENCES

[1] Li Guihua, Zhang Yuanyuan. Beyond the one-dimensional man-on Marcuse's critical theory of technological alienation [J].Social Science Front, 2012, No.205 (07): 30-32. 
[2] Marx. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2014 : 45. 
[3] Marcuse. A one-dimensional study of human-developed industrial society ideology [M]. Translated by Liu Ji, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014: 56.
[4] Marcuse. A one-dimensional study of human-developed industrial society ideology [M]. Translated by Liu Ji, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014: 2. 
[5] Benjamin. Works of art in the era of mechanical reproduction [M].Beijing: China City Press, 2001: 13. 
[6] Jean Baudrillard. Material system [M], translated by Lin Zhiming. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2019: 212.
[7] Yang Xiaolian. Consumption Era and the Construction of Modern New Sensibility - From Marcuse's New Sensibility Theory [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2006 ( 04 ) : 68-73.
[8] Zhang Zhicang. On Marcuse's Liberation Aesthetics [J].Marxism and Reality, 2007, (05): 34-40.
[9] Marcuse. A one-dimensional study of human-developed industrial society ideology [M]. Translated by Liu Ji, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014: 207.
[10] Shu Kaizhi. Aesthetic Justice: Aesthetic Issues in the Era of Aesthetic Capitalism [J].Study of Marxist Aesthetics, 2017, 20 (02): 107-119 + 5-6.
[11] Yang Lan, Zhang Rui. The enlightenment significance and lost path of aesthetic redemption [J].Guizhou Social Sciences, 2016, No. 313 (01): 20-25.
[12] Schiller. Aesthetic Education Letters [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1985: 14.
[13] Wang Haoran. Reflection and exploration on the critique of instrumental rationality [J].Theory, 2015, (18): 35-36.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.