Marcuse's Critical Theory of Technical Rationality
DOI: 10.23977/artpl.2023.040407 | Downloads: 41 | Views: 446
Author(s)
Li Yudi 1
Affiliation(s)
1 College of Liberal Arts, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China
Corresponding Author
Li YudiABSTRACT
As a representative of the Frankfurt School, Marcuse has repeatedly discussed the relationship between technology and freedom. He attributes human alienation to the fact that technological rationality has become a covered ideology in developed industrial society, thus making people lose negativity, transcendence and criticism, and then become 'one-dimensional people '. This paper takes Marcuse's "comfortable non-freedom" as the starting point, and discusses Marcuse's critical theory of technical rationality from three aspects: loss of freedom, paralysis of freedom and return to freedom. It further analyzes how Marcuse reshapes subject freedom and achieves social liberation from the perspective of aesthetics and art.
KEYWORDS
Freedom, marcuse, technical rationalityCITE THIS PAPER
Li Yudi, Marcuse's Critical Theory of Technical Rationality. Art and Performance Letters (2023) Vol. 4: 35-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040407.
REFERENCES
[1] Li Guihua, Zhang Yuanyuan. Beyond the one-dimensional man-on Marcuse's critical theory of technological alienation [J].Social Science Front, 2012, No.205 (07): 30-32.
[2] Marx. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2014 : 45.
[3] Marcuse. A one-dimensional study of human-developed industrial society ideology [M]. Translated by Liu Ji, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014: 56.
[4] Marcuse. A one-dimensional study of human-developed industrial society ideology [M]. Translated by Liu Ji, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014: 2.
[5] Benjamin. Works of art in the era of mechanical reproduction [M].Beijing: China City Press, 2001: 13.
[6] Jean Baudrillard. Material system [M], translated by Lin Zhiming. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2019: 212.
[7] Yang Xiaolian. Consumption Era and the Construction of Modern New Sensibility - From Marcuse's New Sensibility Theory [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2006 ( 04 ) : 68-73.
[8] Zhang Zhicang. On Marcuse's Liberation Aesthetics [J].Marxism and Reality, 2007, (05): 34-40.
[9] Marcuse. A one-dimensional study of human-developed industrial society ideology [M]. Translated by Liu Ji, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014: 207.
[10] Shu Kaizhi. Aesthetic Justice: Aesthetic Issues in the Era of Aesthetic Capitalism [J].Study of Marxist Aesthetics, 2017, 20 (02): 107-119 + 5-6.
[11] Yang Lan, Zhang Rui. The enlightenment significance and lost path of aesthetic redemption [J].Guizhou Social Sciences, 2016, No. 313 (01): 20-25.
[12] Schiller. Aesthetic Education Letters [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1985: 14.
[13] Wang Haoran. Reflection and exploration on the critique of instrumental rationality [J].Theory, 2015, (18): 35-36.
Downloads: | 10568 |
---|---|
Visits: | 316015 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting