Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Literature review on the quality and guarantee mechanism of higher education

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aduhe.2023.051704 | Downloads: 11 | Views: 332

Author(s)

Hou Xuechen 1,2, Lee Khiam Jin 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Business, Malaysia University of Science and Technology, 47810, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
2 School of Accounting and Finance, Xi'an Peihua University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710125, China

Corresponding Author

Hou Xuechen

ABSTRACT

There are various issues regarding the quality of higher education. First and foremost, the government is allocating a fixed amount of funds for higher education. However, the enrolment in higher education institutions is increasing every year. Secondly, there is a shortage of trained teachers. It is argued that international institutions have lowered their admission criteria to generate more funds and revenues. These issues resulted in lowering the quality and guarantee mechanism of higher education institutions. The current education system is not suitable to assess the quality and guarantee mechanism of higher educational institutions. This study will measure the literature review about quality and guarantee mechanism of higher institutions.

KEYWORDS

Higher education, quality and guarantee mechanism, literature review

CITE THIS PAPER

Hou Xuechen, Lee Khiam Jin, Literature review on the quality and guarantee mechanism of higher education. Adult and Higher Education (2023) Vol. 5: 20-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051704.

REFERENCES

[1] Yue, C. (2015). Expansion and equality in Chinese higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 50-58.  
[2] Xu, C. L., & Montgomery, C. (2019). Educating China on the move: A typology of contemporary Chinese higher education mobilities. Review of Education, 7(3), 598-627. 
[3] Huang, F. (2015). Building the world-class research universities: A case study of China. Higher Education, 70(2), 203-215. 
[4] Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76. 
[5] Guo, Y., & Guo, S. (2017). Internationalization of Canadian higher education: Discrepancies between policies and international student experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 851-868. 
[6] Zhao, X. (2017). Qualitatively different ways of experiencing learning: A phenomenographic investigation of international economics and trade undergraduates’ conceptions of learning in a Chinese-Australian cooperative programme (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London).
[7] Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194-203.
[8] Espinosa, L. L., Turk, J. M., Taylor, M., & Chessman, H. M. (2019). Race and ethnicity in higher education: A status report.
[9] Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197-217.
[10] Hua, Y., Xie, R., & Su, Y. (2018). Fiscal spending and air pollution in Chinese cities: Identifying composition and technique effects. China Economic Review, 47, 156-169.
[11] Longhurst, G. J., Stone, D. M., Dulohery, K., Scully, D., Campbell, T., & Smith, C. F. (2020). Strength, weakness, opportunity, threat (SWOT) analysis of the adaptations to anatomical education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in response to the Covid‐19 pandemic. Anatomical sciences education, 13(3), 301-311.
[12] Shambaugh, D. (2015). The coming Chinese crackup. Wall Street Journal, 6, 382.
[13] Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D., & Martinuzzi, A. (2019). The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 
[14] Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277-299.
[15] Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Bodily, R. G., & Sandberg, D. S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The internet and Higher education, 28, 17-27.
[16] Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in second language learning and teaching, 6(3), 455-486.
[17] Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1053-1070.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.