The Research of Relationship among the Stress, Resilience and Subjective Well-being of University Students
DOI: 10.23977/appep.2023.040901 | Downloads: 21 | Views: 208
Haiwei Liang 1,2, Jongnam Baek 2
1 School of Education and Music, Sanming University, Sanming, China
2 Department of Special Education, Woosuk University, Wanju-gun, Republic of Korea
Corresponding AuthorJongnam Baek
Subjective well-being refers to an individual's evaluation of their quality of life based on their own criteria. This study aims to explore the relationship between stress, resilience, and subjective well-being among college students, with a deep analysis of the mediating effect of resilience in predicting subjective well-being in the context of stress. The research aims to enrich the existing literature on subjective well-being and provide valuable insights for enhancing the psychological well-being of college students.
KEYWORDSUniversity Students, Stress, Resilience, Subjective Well-being
CITE THIS PAPER
Haiwei Liang, Jongnam Baek, The Research of Relationship among the Stress, Resilience and Subjective Well-being of University Students. Applied & Educational Psychology (2023) Vol. 4: 1-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/appep.2023.040901.
 Zhang L, Che W. B, Li B. (2005) A Research on College Students' Coping Styles of Psychological Stress. Psychological Science, 28(1): 36-41.
 Yang Y. (2005). The Development of the Resiliency Scale of University Students and Its Application. Central China Normal University. Master Dissertation, Wuhan: Central China Normal University.
 Duan J. H. (1996) Trial results and analysis of global happiness Scale in Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4(1): 56-57.
 Zhang G. Y. (2019). Study on the Relationship among Occupational Stress, Psychological Resilience and Subjective Well-being of Korean Nationality Primary School Teacher. Master Dissertation, Jilin: Yan bian University.
 Gao Z. H. (2023). How to improve the subjective well-being of contemporary college students. Social & Family, (2): 39-41.