Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Analysis of the relationship between the audit market competition and the quality of accounting information disclosure

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/acccm.2023.051103 | Downloads: 49 | Views: 408

Author(s)

Shutong Liu 1

Affiliation(s)

1 University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315199, China

Corresponding Author

Shutong Liu

ABSTRACT

The relationship between audit market competition and the quality of accounting information disclosure is an important topic in accounting research. The improved level of competition in the audit market may motivate auditors to provide higher quality audit services, thus enhancing the quality and reliability of accounting information disclosure. However, excessive levels of competition may also lead audit contractors to sacrifice audit quality in order to reduce costs. This paper discusses the relationship between audit market competition and the quality of accounting information disclosure through literature review and empirical research.

KEYWORDS

Audit market competition, accounting information disclosure, audit quality, level of competition, empirical research

CITE THIS PAPER

Shutong Liu, Analysis of the relationship between the audit market competition and the quality of accounting information disclosure. Accounting and Corporate Management (2023) Vol. 5: 12-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2023.051103.

REFERENCES

[1] Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms' credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 203-243.
[2] Chan, K. H., Farrell, N., & Lee, G. M. (2011). Earnings management, litigation risk, and audit firm specialization. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 7(2), 91-105.
[3] Li, C., & Zhang, J. (2013). Does auditor industry specialization improve audit quality? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 76-93.
[4] Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
[5] Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors' accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827-858.
[6] DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
[7] Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157-191.
[8] Lennox, C. S. (2000). Do companies successfully engage in opinion shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 321-337.
[9] Li, C., & Zhang, J. (2010). Auditor specialization, auditor dominance, and earnings quality: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 1-27.
[10] Palmrose, Z. V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.

Downloads: 15472
Visits: 193857

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.