Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Comparative Study of Undergraduates' Understanding of Scientific Virtue

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/trance.2024.060223 | Downloads: 6 | Views: 81

Author(s)

Guodong Zhao 1, Minghui Sui 1, Bingou Xu 1, Wenqing Wu 2, Zeya Bai 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Education Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
2 School of Philosophy and Social Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

Corresponding Author

Guodong Zhao

ABSTRACT

It is of great significance to explore virtue as the internal driving force of subject moral practice. This study investigates the situation of Undergraduates in the four dimensions through the questionnaire method, including scientific virtue content, scientific virtue judgment, scientific virtue motivation and scientific virtue decision-making. The results show that the overall level of Undergraduates' understanding of scientific virtue is above medium, there are significant differences between grades and disciplines in the four dimensions.

KEYWORDS

Scientific morality, Scientific virtue, Understanding of scientific virtue

CITE THIS PAPER

Guodong Zhao, Minghui Sui, Bingou Xu, Wenqing Wu, Zeya Bai, A Comparative Study of Undergraduates' Understanding of Scientific Virtue. Transactions on Comparative Education (2024) Vol. 6: 154-160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2024.060223.

REFERENCES

[1] Nyberg, D. (2008). The morality of everyday activities: Not the right, but the good thing to do. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9530-1
[2] Kovac, J. (2013). Reverence and ethics in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 745-756. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11948-012-9397-0
[3] Pennock, R. T., & O’Rourke, M. (2017). Developing a scientific virtue-based approach to science ethics training. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2
[4] Berling, E., McLeskey, C., O’Rourke, M., & Pennock, R. T. (2019). A new method for a virtue-based responsible conduct of research curriculum: pilot test results. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 899-910. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11948-017-9991-2
[5] McLeskey, C., Berling, E., Rourke, M. O., & Pennock, R. T. (2020). The Evolution of the Scientific Virtues Toolbox Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research Training Evolution in Action: Past, Present and Future (pp. 535-550): Springer.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.