An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Peer Review in Teaching English Writing in Higher Vocational Colleges
DOI: 10.23977/trance.2025.070212 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 197
Author(s)
Songyang Jiang 1, Pinsu Zheng 1, Tingting Wu 1, Yan Li 1, Yujie He 2
Affiliation(s)
1 Nanchong Vocational and Technical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, 637131, China
2 Guang'an Friendship Middle School of Sichuan, Guang'an, Sichuan, 638000, China
Corresponding Author
Songyang JiangABSTRACT
With the increasing demand for personalized and collaborative evaluation in higher vocational English writing teaching, problems such as delayed feedback, insufficient student participation, and lack of revision guidance in traditional writing teaching have gradually become prominent. The existing teaching control and evaluation mechanism is difficult to achieve refined identification and intervention of key links in the writing process (such as vocabulary use, sentence logic, paragraph cohesion, etc.). To this end, this paper introduces a structured peer evaluation teaching strategy to explore its role in improving students' English writing quality and autonomous learning ability. This strategy integrates social cultural theory, cooperative learning theory and self-efficacy theory, and builds a collaborative feedback mechanism based on the "zone of proximal development". The specific implementation includes scientific grouping, application of standardized evaluation rubrics, revision process annotation comparison, and teacher supervision and feedback throughout the process, focusing on multi-dimensional evaluation training of logic, language and content. The experimental results show that peer review significantly promotes the improvement of English writing ability of higher vocational students, and the effects of different peer review tools vary. Group A (using the Peerceptiv intelligent peer review system) and Group B (using the iWrite platform for peer review) performed best, with their average writing scores increased from 64.5 to 73.3 (↑13.6%) and 63.9 to 72.1 (↑12.8%) after seven weeks of teaching intervention, effectively promoting the improvement of their writing cognitive ability and collaborative revision awareness.
KEYWORDS
Peer Assessment; English Writing Teaching; Artificial Intelligence; Internet of Things; Intelligent Evaluation SystemCITE THIS PAPER
Songyang Jiang, Pinsu Zheng, Tingting Wu, Yan Li, Yujie He, An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Peer Review in Teaching English Writing in Higher Vocational Colleges. Transactions on Comparative Education (2025) Vol. 7: 83-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2025.070212.
REFERENCES
[1] Liu C, Hou J, Tu Y F, et al. Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments[J]. Interactive Learning Environments, 2023, 31(9): 5614-5632.
[2] Bibi Z, Atta A. The role of ChatGPT as AI English writing assistant: A study of student's perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction[J]. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 2024, 5(1): 433-443.
[3] Chen B, Zhang N. Analysis of English Writing Teaching Strategies in High School from the Perspective of Chunk Theory[J]. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 2024, 7(4): 37-46.
[4] Olowoyeye C A C, Deji-Afuye O O, Aladesusi G A. Effect of multimedia instructional approach on English writing performance of pre-service technical teachers in South-Western Nigeria[J]. Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2023, 3(1): 21-30.
[5] Hawanti S, Zubaydulloevna K M. AI chatbot-based learning: alleviating students' anxiety in English writing classroom[J]. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 2023, 7(2): 182-192.
[6] Lam N T H, Le T N D. Stakeholder's Perceptions of ChatGPT in Teaching and Learning English Paragraph Writing at Van Lang University[J]. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 2024, 15(2): 42-59.
[7] Cahyono B Y, Istıqomah F, Fıtrıyah I, et al. Efl Teachers' Voice On Their Preferred Strategies In Teaching Efl Writing During The Pandemic: Investigating The Role Of Technology[J]. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2023, 24(3): 330-350.
[8] Wulandari F, Astuti M T, Marhamah M. Enhancing writing literacy teachers' through AI development[J]. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 2024, 10(1): 246-256.
[9] Muniruzzaman S M, Afrin S. Improving academic writing skill: Difficulties encountered by undergraduates of English studies in Bangladesh[J]. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 2024, 11(2): 215-231.
[10] Akbarani R. The use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching[J]. International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics (IJELAL), 2023, 4(1): 14-23.
[11] Nguyen T H B, Tran T D H. Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT in language teaching[J]. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 2023, 14(2): 156-167.
Downloads: | 13030 |
---|---|
Visits: | 463270 |