Non-state shareholders' equity and audit fees
DOI: 10.23977/acccm.2023.051212 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 484
Author(s)
Gao Ya 1, Li Chaoying 2
Affiliation(s)
1 China Center for Information Industry Development, Haidian, Beijing, 100048, China
2 Liaoning Police College, Dalian, Liaoning, 116036, China
Corresponding Author
Li ChaoyingABSTRACT
In order to introduce private capital and promote the development of state-owned enterprises, the Third Plenum of the Eighteenth Party Congress proposed the active development of a mixed ownership economy in 2013, accelerating the process of mixed ownership reform in state-owned enterprises. From the perspective of audit cost and audit risk, the introduction of non-state shareholders reduces the company's audit cost and risk, thus reducing the audit fees of listed companies. This paper analyzes the impact of the proportion of non-state shareholders' equity on audit fees from the perspective of equity structure, using information disclosed by listed companies on the nature and shareholding ratio of the top ten shareholders. The study found that the proportion of non-state shareholders' equity can significantly reduce audit fees.
KEYWORDS
Non-state shareholders, audit fees, mixed ownership reform, audit riskCITE THIS PAPER
Gao Ya, Li Chaoying, Non-state shareholders' equity and audit fees. Accounting and Corporate Management (2023) Vol. 5: 73-79. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2023.051212.
REFERENCES
[1] Dopuch, N. and Simunic, D. A. (1980) The nature of competition in the auditing profession: a descriptive and normative view, in Buckley, J., Weston, F. (Eds), Regulation and the Accounting Profession, Lifetime Learning Publications.
[2] Tang, T. J., Wu, J. Y., Ma, X. X., Song, X. Z. (2020) Governance of non-state-owned shareholders and audit fees: Based on empirical evidence of mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises. Auditing Research, 1, 68-77.
[3] Li, B. F. (2017) State-owned capital reform and mixed ownership -- based on the perspective of principal-agent theory. Economic Problems, 12, 66-70.
[4] Hu, A G. (2001)Ownership, Government R&D, Private R&D, and Productivity in Chinese Industry. Journal of comparative economics, 29, 1, 0-157.
[5] Chen, D. P., Chen, Y. S. (2011) Research on the relationship between ownership concentration, equity balance and corporate performance -- An empirical test of small and medium-sized enterprises from 2007 to 2009. Accounting Research Study, 1, 38-43.
[6] Xu, J. (2013) Power intensity of senior management, checks and balances of other major shareholders and on-the-job consumption: A case study of listed real estate companies in China. Soft Science, 27(04), 65-70.
[7] Zhu, H. J., Wang, H. (2004) Can equity checks and balances improve corporate governance? -- Case study of the battle for control of Hongzhi Technology Co., LTD. Management World, 10, 114-123.
[8] Yu, A., Li, X. Y., Xue, X. (2012) Analysis of the relationship between equity balance degree and corporate performance of private listed companies in China. Economic vertical and horizontal, 6, 110-113.
[9] Huang, S. J. (2014) Research on mixed ownership reform of State-owned enterprises in China. Economic Administration, 7, 1-10.
[10] Hao, Y, Gong, L. T. (2017) Mixed state-owned and private equity participation and corporate performance improvement. Economic Research, 3, 122-135.
[11] Liu, Y. G., Zheng, Q., Cai, G. L. (2016) Do non-state shareholders improve the quality of internal controls in state-owned enterprises? -- Empirical evidence from state-owned listed companies. Accounting Research Study, 11, 61-68+96.
[12] Mou, S. H., Li, Q. H., Yu, L. P. (2014) Internal control, executive Power and Audit Fees: An empirical study based on the data of non-financial listed companies from 2009 to 2012. Auditing and Economic Research, 4, 42-51.
[13] Wu, P. F., Zhang, T. T., Yang, L. (2017) Board structure characteristics and accounting conservatism [J]. Productivity Research, 12, 1-7.
[14] Chi, G. H., Wang, J. (2018) Board characteristics and internal control defect information disclosure: An empirical study from the perspective of institutional change. Financial theory and practice, 039, 006, 83-89.
[15] Mei, C., Fang, G. H. (2020) Whether enterprise credit rating influence audit fee [J]. Modern marketing (below the ten-day), 4, 185-187.
[16] Utpal et al. (2003) The World Price of Earnings Opacity. The Accounting Review, 2.
Downloads: | 19881 |
---|---|
Visits: | 269342 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics