Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice
  4. Vol 7, Issue 1, 2024

Research on Integrating Forgetting Behavior into Student Models for Online Learning Systems

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jaip.2024.070122 | Downloads: 21 | Views: 704

Author(s)

Ze Song 1

Affiliation(s)

1 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, China

Corresponding Author

Ze Song

ABSTRACT

Modelling students accurately is an important task in online learning systems. In online learning systems, student models are usually built by dealing with students’ historical data of answering questions as input, and eventually output to what extent the student has mastered a certain knowledge component. To evaluate a student model, a commonly used method, namely knowledge tracing, is to build multiple student models based on multiple continuous historical data as mentioned above, then predict whether or not a student can answer a question correctly, and finally compare predicted results with true results. However, the behavior of students is complicated and unpredictable, thus makes student modelling and knowledge tracing become very difficult tasks. Based on existing research of knowledge tracing, especially deep knowledge tracing which uses LSTM to model students, this paper proposes a novel method of student modeling. Compared with other state-of-the-art student modeling methods, the most significant feature of our modeling methods is our method can take students' forgetting behavior into consideration. Moreover, our modeling method can appropriately handle situations that one question corresponds to multiple knowledge components. To test the performance of our student model, this paper applies our student model to the knowledge tracing task. Based on our experiments in public datasets, when one question corresponds to multiple knowledge components and the length of students' historical data is greater, our model performs better in terms of all metrics compared to state-of-the-art knowledge tracing methods.

KEYWORDS

Online Learning Systems, Student Modelling, Knowledge Tracing, Forgetting Behaviour, LSTM

CITE THIS PAPER

Ze Song, Research on Integrating Forgetting Behavior into Student Models for Online Learning Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice (2024) Vol. 7: 146-153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jaip.2024.070122.

REFERENCES

[1] T. Corbett and J. R. Anderson. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, vol. 4, pp. 253–278, 1994.
[2] Piech, J. Bassen, J. Huang, S. Ganguli, M. Sahami, L. J. Guibas, and J. Sohl-Dickstein, "Deep knowledge tracing," Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, vol. 28, 2015.
[3] P. I. Pavlik Jr, H. Cen, and K. R. Koedinger, "Performance factors analysis–a new alternative to knowledge tracing." Online Submission, 2009.
[4] Z. A. Pardos and N. T. Heffernan, "Modeling individualization in a bayesian networks implementation of knowledge tracing," in User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization: 18th International Conference, UMAP 2010, Big Island, HI, USA, June 20-24, 2010. Proceedings 18. Springer, 2010, pp. 255–266.
[5] Y. Wang and N. T. Heffernan, "The student skill model," in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 11th International Conference, ITS 2012, Chania, Crete, Greece, June 14-18, 2012. Proceedings 11.  Springer, 2012, pp. 399–404.
[6] Zhang Li "The "assistance" model: Leveraging how many hints and attempts a student needs," in Twenty-fourth international FLAIRS conference, 2011.
[7] M. Khajah, R. V. Lindsey, and M. C. Mozer, "How deep is knowledge tracing?" arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.02416, 2016. 
[8] J. Zhang, X. Shi, I. King, and D.Y. Yeung, "Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing," in Proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web, 2017, pp. 765–774.
[9] S. Pandey and J. Srivastava, "Rkt: relation-aware self-attention for knowledge tracing," in Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2020, pp. 1205–1214.
[10] Shin, Y. Shim, H. Yu, S. Lee, B. Kim, and Y. S. Choi, "Integrating temporal features for ednet correctness prediction," in Proceedings of the LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Irvine, CA, USA, 2021, pp. 12–16.
[11] S. Yang, M. Zhu, J. Hou, and X. Lu, "Deep knowledge tracing with convolutions," arXiv preprint arXiv: 2008. 01169, 2020.
[12] Y. Qiu, Y. Qi, H. Lu, Z. A. Pardos, and N. T. Heffernan, "Does time matter? modeling the effect of time with bayesian knowledge tracing." in EDM, 2011, pp. 139–148.
[13] L. Averell and A. Heathcote, "The form of the forgetting curve and the fate of memories," Journal of mathematical psychology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2011.
[14] H. Ebbinghaus, "Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology," Annals of neurosciences, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 155, 2013.
[15] Lalwani and S. Agrawal, "What does time tell? tracing the forgetting curve using deep knowledge tracing," in Artifi- cial Intelligence in Education: 20th International Conference, AIED 2019, Chicago, IL, USA, June 25-29, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 20.  Springer, 2019, pp. 158–162.
[16] K. Nagatani, Q. Zhang, M. Sato, Y.-Y. Chen, F. Chen, and T. Ohkuma, "Augmenting knowledge tracing by considering forgetting behavior," in The world wide web conference, 2019, pp. 3101–3107.
[17] L. Zhang, X. Xiong, S. Zhao, A. Botelho, and N. T. Heffernan, "Incorporating rich features into deep knowledge tracing," in Proceedings of the fourth (2017) ACM conference on learning@ scale, 2017, pp. 169–172.
[18] M. Feng, N. Heffernan, and K. Koedinger, “Addressing the assessment challenge with an online system that tutors as it as- sesses,” User modeling and user-adapted interaction, vol. 19, pp. 243–266, 2009.
[19] Y. Choi, Y. Lee, D. Shin, J. Cho, S. Park, S. Lee, J. Baek, Bae, B. Kim, and J. Heo, "Ednet: A large-scale hierarchical dataset in education," in Artificial Intelligence in Education: 21st International Conference, AIED 2020, Ifrane, Morocco, July 6–10, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 21. Springer, 2020, pp. 69–73.
[20] Tang Y M. Impact of Self-Directed Learning and Educational Technology Readiness on Synchronous E-Learning. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 2021, pp. 1-20.  

Subscription
E-Mail Alert
Most popular papers
Call for Special Issue
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
Plagiarism Policy
Contact Us
Downloads: 12221
Visits: 328959

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.