Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

"I don’t discriminate but……": Legitimation Strategies of Covert Online Hate Speech against Homosexuality in China

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/langl.2024.070311 | Downloads: 1 | Views: 82

Author(s)

Cai Zhenlei 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of English Studies, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, China

Corresponding Author

Cai Zhenlei

ABSTRACT

Internet provides an enormous space for free speech, especially for hate speech. Recent years have witnessed the increasing discriminating speech against homosexuality, which sounds righteous with the strategies of talk in China because the major opinion in online space is homophobia, which is not benefit for the equal rights and living circumstances for homosexuality. Therefore, it's necessary to probe into how these covert hate speeches are legitimized and how they create a more profound homophobic atmosphere. In this study, comments, which are hate speech to homosexuality, under 5 videos on Bilibili are collected, classified with the assistance of corpus. Then, the results are analyzed under the legitimation strategies, proposed by Van Leeuvan. Finally, it showed that three strategies are used and the incitement of covert hate speech are more powerful than overt hate speech. The study could provide a discursive angle for the problems of civil rights and equal social status of gay community.

KEYWORDS

Homophobia; legitimation; hate speech; discourse

CITE THIS PAPER

Cai Zhenlei, "I don’t discriminate but……": Legitimation Strategies of Covert Online Hate Speech against Homosexuality in China. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2024) Vol. 7: 80-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2024.070311.

REFERENCES

[1] Jonathan Culpeper. (2021) Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 4-11.
[2] Teresa Marques. (2022) The Expression of Hate in Hate Speech. Journal of Applied Philosophy, (8), 1-20.
[3] Katharine Gelber. (2019) Differentiating hate speech: a systemic discrimination approach. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24(4), 393-414.
[4] Caitlin Ring Carlson. (2021) Hate Speech. London: The MIT Press.
[5] Alexander Brown. (2017) What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities, 0(0), 1-30.
[6] Chekol M et al. (2023) Social media hate speech in the walk of Ethiopian political reform: analysis of hate speech prevalence, severity, and natures. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1), 218-237.
[7] Soudeh Ghaffari. (2022) Discourses of celebrities on Instagram: digital femininity, selfrepresentation and hate speech. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 161-178.
[8] Vahid Parvaresh. (2023) Covertly communicated hate speech: A corpus-assisted pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics, 205, 63-77.
[9] Baider. (2022) Covert Hate Speech, Conspiracy Theory and Anti semitism: Linguistic Analysis Versus Legal Judgement. Pragmatics of society, 34. 
[10] Weiming Ye. (2023)"I know it's sensitive": Internet censorship, recoding, and the sensitive word culture in China. Discourse, Context and Media (51), 76-86.
[11] Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966) The social construction of reality. Harmonsworth: Penguin.
[12] Van Leeuwen, T. (2007) Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse &Society, 1 (1), 91–112.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.