The Heterogenous Effect of Tax Incentives on Different Types of Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China
DOI: 10.23977/infse.2024.050313 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 237
Author(s)
Yiqi He 1, Zhihui Li 1, Wenhong Yan 2
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Accounting, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, 210023, China
2 School of Public Finance and Taxation, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, 210023, China
Corresponding Author
Wenhong YanABSTRACT
Government interventions, especially tax incentives, are vital to corporate innovation. However, is the effect of tax incentives heterogeneous across different types of innovation? Do tax incentives affect innovation differently in different business environments? This study approaches these questions empirically using data from China's listed companies from 2010 to 2020, analyzes the effect of tax incentives on enterprises' exploratory and developmental innovation, and discusses the impact of the business environment on such a relationship. The results suggest that tax incentives can promote exploratory innovation and developmental innovation, and have a greater impact on developmental innovation, and a good business environment strengthens this role.
KEYWORDS
Tax incentives, Enterprise innovation, Exploratory innovation, Developmental innovation, Business environmentCITE THIS PAPER
Yiqi He, Zhihui Li, Wenhong Yan, The Heterogenous Effect of Tax Incentives on Different Types of Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China. Information Systems and Economics (2024) Vol. 5: 94-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infse.2024.050313.
REFERENCES
[1] Hall, B. H. (2021). 5 Tax Policy for Innovation. In A. Goolsbee & B. Jones (Eds.), Innovation and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press.
[2] Fu, S.Y, Liu, D.H, Hunag, F.Q.(2024).Synergistic effect of government policy and market mechanism on the innovation of new energy vehicle enterprises.Energy,295,130998.
[3] Sarfo, C., Zhang, J.A., O'Kane, C., O'Kane, P. (2024).Perceived value of microfinance and SME performance: The role of exploratory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(2), 172-185.
[4] Mason, C., Botelho, T., & Duggett, J. (2022). Promoting cross-border investing by business angels in the European Union. Regional Studies, 56(8), 1391–1403.
[5] Han, X., Wang, J., Cheng, H. (2021). The effect of corporate tax avoidance on salary distribution—Empirical evidence from publicly listed companies in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78, 101917.
[6] Niu, B., Ruan, Y., Zeng, F. (2022). Promoting remanufacturing through subsidy and environment tax: Channel co-opetition, incentive alignment and regulation optimization. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 166, 102880.
[7] Li, X., Tang, J., Huang, J. (2023). Place-based policy upgrading, business environment, and urban innovation: Evidence from high-tech zones in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102545.
[8] Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2021). How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 124, 299–311.
Downloads: | 10589 |
---|---|
Visits: | 209763 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics