Author(s)

Yiping Qian ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China

Corresponding Author

Yiping Qian

ABSTRACT

Compared with the characteristics of previous employees, the new employees after 00 show obvious differences. This makes managers have to take new management measures for "after 00" employees. Abuse management is a more radical management method among management types. When abuse management is applied to "Post - 00" employees, employees' active behavior will be affected to a certain extent. Through literature research, questionnaire survey and data analysis, this paper uses spss23 0 sort out and analyze the 121 questionnaire data collected, and use the bootstrap method to test the hypothesis of the theoretical model.Examining the impact of abusive supervision on Generation Z employees' proactive behavior, this research specifically investigates how leader-member exchange mediates this relationship, contributing to both organizational behavior theory and human resource management practices. In the management practice of enterprises, abuse management usually has a negative impact on the active behavior of "Post - 00" employees, and then affects their active behavior. Enterprises should alleviate the degree of abuse management, reduce the impact of abuse management on the relationship between leaders and members, and then alleviate the impact on employees' active behavior, so as to make the enterprise move in a direction more conducive to the development of the organization.

KEYWORDS

Abusive leadership; Employees after 00; Active behavior

CITE THIS PAPER

Yiping Qian, A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Abusive Management on the Proactive Behavior of Post-2000 Employees. Journal of Human Resource Development (2025) Vol. 7: 63-75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jhrd.2025.070110.

REFERENCES

[1] Xu Qin, Xi Meng, Zhao Shuming. Research on Abusive Supervision and Employees' Proactive Behavior from the Perspective of Work Engagement and Core Self - Evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2015, 12(03): 347 - 354.
[2] Ma Lu, Wang Danyang. The Influence of Shared Leadership on Employees' Proactive Innovation Behavior[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2016, 33(22): 131 - 136.
[3] Yang Changjin, Tang Dingping, Mei Jing. Research on Abusive Supervision and Employees' Proactive Innovation Behavior: From the Perspective of Motivation and Ability Belief[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(03): 143 - 150.
[4] Wang Dan. Research on the Influence of Abusive Supervision on Miners’ Unsafe Behavior[J]. Economy and Management, 2012, 26(10): 65 - 70.
[5] Cao Yashuang. Research on the Influence of Abusive Supervision on the Turnover Intention of Knowledge Workers: The Role of Organizational Identification and Personality Traits[D]. Northeastern University, 2014.
[6] Zhang Kun. The Influence of Implicit Followership on Voice Behavior and Its Mechanism [D]. Guangzhou University, 2017. 
[7] Ren Han, Xu Yaling, Chen Weizheng. The Influence of Abusive Management on Employee Work Alienation from the Perspective of Generational Differences [J]. Economic Management, 2014, 36(02): 65-75. DOI: 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2014.02.009.
[8] Wang Chunyan. A Study on the Relationship between Abusive Leadership and Employee Voice: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce, 2021, (02): 35-40. DOI: 10.16335/j.cnki.issn1672 - 2604.2021.02.009.
[9] Chen Yanhong. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Humble Leadership on Employees' Proactive Behavior[D]. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019. DOI: 10.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2019.000301.
[10] Liu Xiujuan, Hu Ning. A Review and Prospect of Shared Leadership Research[J]. Modern Economic Information, 2020, (13): 177 - 178.
[11] Jin Yanwen. A Study on the Influence and Mechanism of Transformational Leadership and Person-Organization Fit on Change-Oriented Proactive Behavior [D]. Xiamen University, 2018.
[12] Chao Gang, Liu Qianwen, Qian Chen, et al. A Study on the Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Knowledge Sharing under the Self-Concept [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(18): 188-195.
[13] Zhang Yajun, Zhang Jinlong, Zhang Qianfan, et al. A Study on Abusive Management and User Resistance Considering the Influence of Negative Emotion and Leader-Member Exchange [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2015, 12(12): 1815-1823.
[14] Lu Shichang, Liang Lili, Liu Yutong. The Influence of Abusive Management on Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Chain Mediating Role of Negative Emotion and Ego Depletion [J]. Science & Technology for Development, 2020, 16(02): 192-198.
[15] Cui Zilong, Li Yuyin, Zhang Kaixin. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Ethical Leadership on Subordinates' Proactive Behavior[J]. East China Economic Management, 2015, 29(08): 137 - 143.
[16] Wang Siwen. The Influence of Abusive Management on Employee Silence Behavior [D]. Liaoning University, 2014.
[17] Lin Yaqing, Zhang Yuqing. Does Leader-Member Exchange Relationship Affect Civil Servants' Transformational Organizational Citizenship Behavior? — The Mediating Role of Change Obligation and the Moderating Role of Public Service Motivation [J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2019, 12(01): 132-150+214-215.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics