Optimal Guarantee Level Optimization for Agricultural Insurance-Futures Based on CRRA Utility Maximization
DOI: 10.23977/agrfem.2026.090110 | Downloads: 5 | Views: 139
Author(s)
Jiayi Wang 1, Yile Wang 2
Affiliation(s)
1 Digital College, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
2 School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
Corresponding Author
Yile WangABSTRACT
Agricultural production is highly vulnerable to market price fluctuations, which may lead to unstable income and increased operational risks for farmers. To improve the rationality of guarantee level selection in agricultural "insurance + futures" risk management, this paper proposes an optimization framework based on the Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) utility function and stochastic market analysis. First, a Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model is introduced to characterize the volatility characteristics of agricultural product prices, and a Monte Carlo simulation method is employed to describe possible future market scenarios. Then, an insurance-futures payoff model is established to evaluate farmers' wealth changes under different guarantee levels. By maximizing the expected utility under various risk preference conditions, the optimal guarantee level is determined while considering insurance cost constraints. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework can effectively capture the influence of risk aversion, market volatility, and premium cost on guarantee decisions, providing a quantitative approach for agricultural risk management strategy design. The proposed method offers a decision-making reference for improving the flexibility and efficiency of agricultural insurance-futures products.
KEYWORDS
Agricultural insurance; Insurance + Futures; CRRA utility function; Optimization of coverage levelsCITE THIS PAPER
Jiayi Wang, Yile Wang. Optimal Guarantee Level Optimization for Agricultural Insurance-Futures Based on CRRA Utility Maximization. Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management (2026). Vol. 9, No. 1, 75-84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/agrfem.2026.090110.
REFERENCES
[1] Hossain M S. Assessing smallholder farmers' flood risk behavior and their willingness to pay for crop insurance as a risk coping strategy in northern Bangladesh[J]. Natural Hazards, 2025, 121(4): 4191-4217.
[2] Choe K, Goodwin B K. The Informational Role of Trading Volume in Thinly Traded Options Markets[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2026: 1-19.
[3] Wang Y. Research on the Application of the "Insurance+ Futures" Model for Agricultural Products in Addressing Price Fluctuations[C]//SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2025, 218: 02021.
[4] Li B. Income Distribution for Agricultural Supply Chain Finance Based on Improved Interval Shapley Value[C]//International Conference on Computational Finance and Business Analytics. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025: 299-310.
[5] Liu H. Dynamic correlation between hog futures and industry chain: an empirical study based on time-varying copula model[J]. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2024, 15(11): 5356-5366.
[6] Finger R. A note on European farmers' preferences under cumulative prospect theory[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2024, 75(1): 465-472.
[7] Neuhoff K. Contracting matters: Hedging producers and consumers with a renewable energy pool[J]. The Energy Journal, 2025, 46(4): 203-225.
[8] Canales E, Bergtold J S, Williams J R. Conservation intensification under risk: An assessment of adoption, additionality, and farmer preferences[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2024, 106(1): 45-75.
[9] Raihan A. A review of recent advances, challenges, and potential future directions of climate-smart agriculture[C]//Proceedings of the international conference on climate-smart agriculture. 2024.
[10] Li M S. Research on Corn Income Insurance Pricing under the" Insurance+ Futures" Model[J]. International Business Research, 2025, 18(6).
[11] Ibrahim B A. Volatility contagion between cryptocurrencies, gold and stock markets pre-and-during COVID-19: Evidence using DCC-GARCH and cascade-correlation network[J]. Financial Innovation, 2024, 10(1): 1-28.
[12] Jin B, Xu X. A study of contemporaneous residential real estate price causation across major jiangsu province cities: Methodology using vector error-correction models and directed acyclic graphs[J]. Economics Open, 2025, 1: 2550008.
[13] Jang M. Simulating and assessing carbon markets: Application to the Korean and the EU ETSs[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 195: 114346.
[14] He X J, Chen H, Lin S. A Closed‐Form Formula for Pricing European Options With Stochastic Volatility, Regime Switching, and Stochastic Market Liquidity[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 2025, 45(5): 429-440.
[15] Li X, Zhou W, Lai G. Price Guarantee or Revenue Guarantee? Strategic Design of Agricultural Insurance with Government Subsidies[J]. Strategic Design of Agricultural Insurance with Government Subsidies (March 10, 2026), 2026.
| Downloads: | 7702 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 368557 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Information Systems and Economics
-
Accounting, Auditing and Finance
-
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
-
Tourism Management and Technology Economy
-
Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
-
Financial Engineering and Risk Management
-
Accounting and Corporate Management
-
Social Security and Administration Management
-
Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
-
Statistics & Quantitative Economics
-
Social Medicine and Health Management
-
Land Resource Management
-
Information, Library and Archival Science
-
Journal of Human Resource Development
-
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
-
Operational Research and Cybernetics

Download as PDF