Critical discourse analysis of English textbooks: a methodological study
DOI: 10.23977/trance.2022.040202 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 196
Wenjing Zhang 1
1 College of Education and Sports Sciences, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434023, China
Corresponding AuthorWenjing Zhang
Based on the connotation of critical discourse analysis, this paper examines the evaluation results and re establishes the theoretical framework applicable to the analysis of domestic English textbooks with the principle of critical discourse. The theoretical framework of this study first analyzes the linguistic strategies of textbook text presentation and confirms the category of epistemology; Secondly, through the summary, elaboration and structure analysis at all levels, different argumentation of textbook text is generated; Finally, Fairclough three-dimensional analysis is used to summarize. This study also cites two common categories of epistemology in English textbook texts as examples: multicultural perspective and communication ability to examine whether English textbooks have the discourse of actively presenting multiculturalism and emphasizing communication ability. This paper aims to provide a basis for English teachers' choice, use and insight into textbook ideology through textbook critical discussion, research integration and reconstruction of methodology.
KEYWORDSCritical discourse analysis, Research methodology, Textbook research
CITE THIS PAPER
Wenjing Zhang, Critical discourse analysis of English textbooks: a methodological study. Transactions on Comparative Education (2022) Vol. 4: 10-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2022.040202.
 Apple, M. Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.1993.
 Fairclough, N. Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.1995.
 Luke, A. Critical discourse analysis. In L. J. Saha (Ed.), International encyclopedia on the sociology of education. Oxford: Pergamon. 1997.
 Apple, M. Teachers and text: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge. 1986.
 Nicholls, J. The philosophical underpinnings of school textbook research. Paradigm-Journal of the Textbook Colloquium. 2005. 3(3).
 Foucault, M. The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. London.1981.
 van Dijk, T. A. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 1993.4(2):249-283.
Foster, S.. Dominant traditions in international textbook research and revision. Education Inquiry. 2011. 2(1): 5-20.
 Fowler, R. Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London.1991.
 van Dijk, T. A. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schaffiner & A. Wenden (Eds.),Language and peace . Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.1995.
 Weinbrenner, P. Methodologies of textbook analysis used to date. In H.1992.
 Titscher, S., Meyer, M. Wodak, R.,Vetter, E..Methods of text and discourse analysis.London: Sage. 2000.
 Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.1995.
 Halliday, M. A. K. Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press.1985.