Comparison and Implication of Teacher Qualification System in Middle and Primary Schools between China and Finland
DOI: 10.23977/trance.2022.040302 | Downloads: 5 | Views: 188
Xiongping Liu 1, Zuming Bai 1
1 School of Humanities and Education, Foshan University of Science and Technology, Foshan, 528225, China
Corresponding AuthorXiongping Liu
Application, accreditation, and examination of teacher qualification is the key to ensuring the quality of teachers, which plays a fundamental, and significant role. Given the situation in China, there are still some problems in the current teacher qualification system, such as too extensive application scope, loose restrictions on majors, easy examinations, and simple recognition procedures, which also lead to the uneven level of teachers between individuals and imbalance between regions. The qualification of teachers in Finland is stricter than that in China in terms of academic background, majors, and other requirements, as the qualification examination of teachers in Finland pays more attention to the examinees' research ability, comprehensive quality, and professional motivation, etc. These practices provide a good reference for teacher training, and assessment in China. Individual growth is inseparable from teachers' cultivation; the development of a school relies on teachers' efforts; social progress can't be achieved without teachers' contributions, and a country's prosperity also depends on teachers' strength. The teacher qualification system is a specific professional license system implemented by the state for teachers, which includes the basic conditions of teacher qualification, the principles of qualification recognition, loss and revocation, and the procedures of teacher qualification recognition [ ]. It has specified the qualification classification, requirements, examinations, and identification procedures, which guarantee the overall quality of teachers. Many countries in the world have strict provisions on the qualification standards of teachers. Compared with the qualification system of primary and secondary school teachers in Finland, China still has many shortcomings in this aspect. As one of the most advanced countries in the world, Finland has accumulated rich experience in the application, examination, and certification of teacher qualification, which offers a reference for China.
KEYWORDSChina; Finland; Primary and Secondary Schools; Teacher Qualification System
CITE THIS PAPER
Xiongping Liu, Zuming Bai, Comparison and Implication of Teacher Qualification System in Middle and Primary Schools between China and Finland. Transactions on Comparative Education (2022) Vol. 4: 8-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/trance.2022.040302.
 Writing Group of Education Policies and Regulations. Education Policies and Regulations [M]. Xi 'an: Northwest University Press, 2011.
 Analysis of Finnish Education System to question the reasons behind Finnish success in PISA [J]. Studies in Educational Research and Development .2018(02):93-114.(http://serd.artvin.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/41911/486807)
 Zuo B., Fu X. Z. The Development, Characteristics, and Implications of Teacher Education in Finland [J]. Journal of Guangdong Second Normal University, 2022 (02): 16-23 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 2095-3798.2020.02.003)
 Jia X. Research on Pre-Service Teacher Selection System in Finland [D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University, 2018.
 Fan H. J. A Comparative Study of Primary School Teacher Education between China and Finland -- A Case study of School of Education of Helsinki University and School of Primary Education of Capital Normal University [D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University, 2018.
 Yu M. Y. Seven Departments: Employers in Some Positions can Work First before Acquiring a Certification [EB/OL].
 Yan W. F., Zhang Y., Li Y. H. Thinking of Finland’s Education Craze: Analysis Based on PISA Test [J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2020 (01): 15 to 16 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1671-0916.2020.01.002)
 Li J. Y., Innovation and Development Trend of Teacher Qualification System Reform in China: An exclusive Interview with Liu Limin, President of China Education Association for International Exchange and Former Vice Minister of Ministry of Education [J]. Journal of Teacher Development Research, 2022 (01): 1-12 (DOI: 10.19618/ j.cnKI.ISSN2096-319x.2022.01.001)
 Yu M. Y. Educational Qualifications of Full-time Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools [EB/OL]. (2021-8-28). (http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2020/quanguo/index_3.html)
 Cao J. Educational Qualifications of Full-time Teachers in Ordinary High Schools [EB/OL]. (2021-8-29). (http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2020/quanguo/202108/t20210831_556618.h The TML)
 Mai S. Z., Leng P. Comparative Analysis of Success Factors between China and Finland in PISA [J]. China Teachers, 2012 (21): 71 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1672-2051.2012.21.026)
 Xu Y. X. A Comparative Study on the Training of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Finland and China [J]. Basic Education Research, 2018 (22): 13-14 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1002-3275.2018.22.007)
 Liu Y. Y. Analysis of the Reasons for the Success of Education in Finland [J]. Modern Primary and Secondary Education, 2006 (12): 45-47(DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1002-1477.2006.12.015)
 Zhang X. G. Peer-group Mentoring in Teacher Induction in Finland: Theories, Model, Prerequisites and Effects [J]. Comparative study on education, 2020 (8): 89-96 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1003-7667.2020.08.012)
 Li L., Zhou J. The Research on Quality Assurance System in Finish Pre-service Teacher Education [J]. Comparative Education Research, 2018 (10): 85-86 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1003-7667.2018.10.012)
 Wang M. Y., Yang P. The Path and Enlightenment of Building of Teacher Teams in Finland [J]. Modern Primary and Secondary Education, 2019 (09): 86-91 (DOI: 10.16165 / j.carol carroll nki. 22-1096 / g4.2019.09.019)
 Xi M. H. Striving for Excellence: Learning from Finnish Teacher Education Experience [J]. Exploration of Universities, 2018 (04): 52-56 (DOI: 10.3969 / j.i SSN. 1673-9760.2018.04.012)
 Zhu Q. Implications of Finnish Teacher Education Model to Chinese Normal University Students’ Education. Contemporary Education BBS, 2013 (2): 88-84 (DOI: 10.13694 / j.carol carroll nki ddjylt. 2013.02.021)
 Parth Salber. Finland’s Road: What the World Can Learn from Finland’s Education Reform [M]. Jiangsu Phoenix Science and Technology Press, 2015.
 Yao Z. The Number of Female Faculty of Various Levels and Schools, [EB/OL]. (2021-8-30). (http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2020/quanguo/202108/t20210831_556359.h The TML)
 Yi H. J., Chen Y. Gender Equality in Finnish Teacher Education: Measures, Experiences, and Reflections [J]. International and Comparative Education, 2020, 22 (05): 70-75 (DOI: 10.13763 / j.carol carroll nki jhebnu. ese. 2020.05.010)