How Was Emily Constructed to Be a Woman Noblesse? ---An Interpretation of Emily's Identity from Feminist Gender Studies and Marxist Gender Criticism
DOI: 10.23977/langl.2023.061209 | Downloads: 38 | Views: 427
Author(s)
Yaohui Xu 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Publishing and Printing College, Shanghai, 200093, China
Corresponding Author
Yaohui XuABSTRACT
By using the theory of Feminist Gender Studies and Marxist Gender Criticism, the writer analyses how Emily was constructed to be a woman noblesse. Woman noblesse refers to females in upper wealthy class in the Old South. They were symbols of the Southern aristocracy and prisoner of the past, and they were also dependants. Through analyses, the writer concludes that the Emily's identity was constructed by her family in three aspects: cognition, economy, and emotion. The identity was also constructed by the whole society in its marriage norm and social obligation. Her family and the society formed micro and macro environment trapping her inside and depriving her of love. The identity, woman noblesse, were both like a badge and a chain, bringing her a sense of superiority and prisoning her in the Old South.
KEYWORDS
Woman noblesse, Emily, Feminist Gender Studies, Marxist Gender CriticismCITE THIS PAPER
Yaohui Xu, How Was Emily Constructed to Be a Woman Noblesse? ---An Interpretation of Emily's Identity from Feminist Gender Studies and Marxist Gender Criticism. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2023) Vol. 6: 58-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2023.061209.
REFERENCES
[1] Zhang Boxiang. Selected Readings in English and American Literature. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 1998.
[2] De Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. Vintage. 2011.
[3] Guerin, Wilfred L., Earle Labor, Lee Morgan Jeanne C. Reesman, and John R. Willingham. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2004.
[4] Abel, Elizabeth. "Editor's Introduction". Critical Inquiry 8 (1998): 173-178.
[5] Patricia, Yancey Martin. "Gender as Social Institution". Social Forces. Vol. 82, Issue 4. 2004.06. 1249-1273. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0081
[6] Madsen, Deborah L. Feminist Theory and Literary Practice. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2006.
[7] Faulkner, William. A Rose for Emily. In, Understanding Fiction. Cleanth Brooks and Robert Penn Warren. Pearson Education. 2004. 221-227.
[8] Austin, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Bantam. 1983.
[9] Ryan, Barbara Eileen. Dynamics of Change in Social Movement Ideology and Activism. Routledge. 1993. Https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315811628
[10] Anderson, K. Marxist Classic Feminist Perspectives. In, Thinking About Sociology: A Critical Introduction. Don Mills. Oxford University Press. 2012. 342-361.
Downloads: | 15532 |
---|---|
Visits: | 207441 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting