Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Application of Artificial Intelligence Graphics and Intraoral Scanning in Medical Scenes

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jaip.2023.060601 | Downloads: 23 | Views: 407

Author(s)

Liu Dapeng 1

Affiliation(s)

1 SMU, Singapore Management University, 574045, Singapore

Corresponding Author

Liu Dapeng

ABSTRACT

Intraoral scanning technology has become an essential tool in current digital oral medicine, with rapid technological development and increasingly widespread clinical applications. This article reviews the development process of intraoral scanning technology, classifies and introduces the principles of commonly used intraoral scanning technology, and briefly explains the application of this technology in digital diagnosis and treatment in different fields of dentistry. The author analyzes and compares the scanning accuracy of five different types of oral scanners for scanning single jaw complete dentition plaster models. And evaluate the scanning quality to provide reference for clinical application and provide a basis for further improving the performance of domestic oral scanners in the future. The author used a high-precision desktop scanner (Yunjia UP560) to obtain a digital model and used it as truth group data. After using the analysis software Geomagic Studio14 for "best fit comparison", the author conducted deviation analysis on the true value group and experimental group data, evaluated the quality indicators of the scanned data, and compared the scanning accuracy. In terms of scanning accuracy, international manufacturers represented by iTeroElement1 and 3ShapeTrios3 are both at a high level. The Fusion Scanner, Aoralscan2, and Mediti500 instruments have different advantages in accuracy and precision across different measurement ranges. The accuracy of scanning single tooth crowns with several instruments is better than that of scanning single jaw full dentition, indicating that reducing the scanning range can improve the accuracy of the scanner.

KEYWORDS

Intraoral scanner; Digital technology; Digital dentistry; Precision; Scanning quality evaluation

CITE THIS PAPER

Liu Dapeng, Application of Artificial Intelligence Graphics and Intraoral Scanning in Medical Scenes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice (2023) Vol. 6: 1-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jaip.2023.060601.

REFERENCES

[1] Hong-Seok, P., & Chintal, S. (2015). Development of high speed and high accuracy 3D dental intra oral scanner. Procedia Engineering, 100, 1174-1181. 
[2] Arakida, T., Kanazawa, M., Iwaki, M., Suzuki, T., & Minakuchi, S. (2018). Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. Journal of prosthodontic research, 62(3), 324-329. 
[3] de Waard, O., Baan, F., Verhamme, L., Breuning, H., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M., & Maal, T. (2016). A novel method for fusion of intra-oral scans and cone-beam computed tomography scans for orthognathic surgery planning. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(2), 160-166. 
[4] Kim, M. K., Kim, J. M., Lee, Y. M., Lim, Y. J., & Lee, S. P. (2019). The effect of scanning distance on the accuracy of intra‐oral scanners used in dentistry. Clinical Anatomy, 32(3), 430-438. 
[5] Nulty, A. B. (2021). A comparison of full arch trueness and precision of nine intra-oral digital scanners and four lab digital scanners. Dentistry journal, 9(7), 75.
[6] Ferrini, F., Sannino, G., Chiola, C., Capparé, P., Gastaldi, G., & Gherlone, E. F. (2019). Influence of intra-oral scanner (IOS) on the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM single crowns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(4), 544.
[7] Keeling, A., Wu, J., & Ferrari, M. (2017). Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan. Journal of Dentistry, 59, 33-40. 
[8] Impellizzeri, A., Horodynski, M., De Stefano, A., Palaia, G., Polimeni, A., Romeo, U., ... & Galluccio, G. (2020). CBCT and intra-oral scanner: The advantages of 3D technologies in orthodontic treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9428. 
[9] Haddadi, Y., Bahrami, G., & Isidor, F. (2019). Accuracy of intra-oral scans compared to conventional impression in vitro. Primary dental journal, 8(3), 34-39.
[10] Young J M, Altschuler B R. Laser holography in dentistry [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1977, 38(2): 216-225. 
[11] Duret F, Preston J D. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry [J]. Curr Opin Dent, 1991, 1(2): 150-154.
[12] Liu P R. A panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2005, 26(7): 507-508.
[13] Mörmann W H, Brandestini M, Lutz F, et al. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays [J]. Quintessence Int, 1989, 20(5): 329-339.
[14] Birnbaum N S, Aaronson H B. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: Virtual becomes reality [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2008, 29(8): 494, 496, 498 505.
[15] Wiechmann D. A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Theoretical background and development [J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2002, 63(3): 234-245.
[16] Busch M, Kordass B. Concept and development of a computerized positioning of prosthetic teeth for complete dentures [J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2006, 9(2): 113-120.
[17] Att W, Witkowski S, Strub J, et al. Digital workflow in reconstructive dentistry [M]. Quintessence publishing, 2019: 9-42.
[18] Henkel G L. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2007, 28(8): 422 424, 426-428, 430 -431.
[19] Pieper R. Digital impressionsEasier than ever [J]. IntJ Comput Dent, 2009, 12(1): 47-52.
[20] Kachalia P R, Geissberger M J. Dentistry a la carte: In-office CAD/CAM technology [J]. J Calif Dent Assoc, 2010, 38(5): 323-330.
[21] Haddadi, Y., Bahrami, G., & Isidor, F. (2019). Accuracy of intra-oral scans compared to conventional impression in vitro. Primary dental journal, 8(3), 34-39
[22] Yang Xin. Precision of TRIOS digital impression in simulated oral cavity sampling environment [J]. Journal of Peking University (Medical Edition), 2015, 47 (1): 85-89
[23] Bao Jiong, Guang Hanbing. Exploring the application points and clinical effects of DSD in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth [J]. Oral medicine, 2017, 37 (12): 1099 1103
[24] Zhan Xin, Gao Yang, Zhu Jing, et al. Key points and experience of clinical nursing operation of digital intraoral scanning for newborns with Cleft lip and cleft palate [J]. Journal of Clinical Oral medicine, 2019, 35 (10): 630-632
[25] Gutiérrez-Chico J L, Alegría-Barrero E, Teijeiro-Mestre R, et al. Optical coherence tomography: From research to practice [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 13(5): 370-384.
[26] Alfonso F, Sandoval J, Cárdenas A, et al. Optical coherence tomography: From research to clinical application [J]. Minerva Med, 2012, 103(6): 441 -464.
[27] Yao JW. Digital restorative dentistry and prosthodontics (digital impressions) [J]. J Clin Stomatol, 2016, 32(1): 53-56
[28] Wang Y. Intraoral digital impression technique[J].Stomatology, 2015, 35(9): 705-709, 743
[29] International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results- part 1: general principles and definitions: ISO 5725-1: 1994[S]. Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1994
[30] Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, et al. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: a novel in vivo analysis method[J].J Dent, 2018, 69: 110-118
[31] Zhang XY, Li H, Zhao YJ, et al. Evaluation of the quality of three-dimensional data acquired by using two kinds of structure light intra-oral scanner to scan the crown preparation model[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2016, 51(7): 432-436

Downloads: 6227
Visits: 184929

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.