Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese Government Work Reports and American State of the Union Addresses

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/langl.2023.061516 | Downloads: 58 | Views: 355

Author(s)

Xiao Liangyuan 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong Technology College, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China

Corresponding Author

Xiao Liangyuan

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the types of conceptual metaphors used in Chinese Government Work Reports (CGWRs) and American State of the Union addresses (ASUAs). The corpus selected in this paper is government work reports of China and United States for three consecutive years (2020-2022). The Conceptual Metaphor Theory of cognitive linguistics is used as the theoretical basis, and the differences in the use of political metaphors between Chinese and English are compared by combining critical metaphor analysis (CMA). Through CMA, conceptual metaphor types are derived from these two discourses, and combined with metaphorical criticisms, the hidden ideologies in CGWRs and ASUAs are analyzed.

KEYWORDS

Conceptual metaphor, critical metaphor analysis, government work report

CITE THIS PAPER

Xiao Liangyuan, Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese Government Work Reports and American State of the Union Addresses. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2023) Vol. 6: 95-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2023.061516.

REFERENCES

[1] Richards, A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press. 
[2] Danesi, M. (1992). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension. Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics, 7992, 489-500.
[3] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago press.
[4] Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Springer: Palgrave Macmillan.
[5] McKechnie L. E. F. (2008). Observational research. In Given L. M. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 573–577). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.