Author(s)

Xiaoyu Wang ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Xiaoyu Wang

ABSTRACT

Household financial vulnerability reflects the likelihood that a household will fall into financial distress when facing adverse shocks, and it is a key micro-foundation of financial system stability. Using microdata from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), this study develops a machine-learning-based risk management framework to examine how liquidity constraints affect household financial vulnerability and to identify high-risk groups under heterogeneous socioeconomic conditions. Household financial vulnerability is operationalized as a binary outcome, denoted as the Financial Vulnerability Index (FVI), indicating whether liquid buffers are sufficient to cover unexpected expenditures. Liquidity constraints are measured through credit accessibility indicators, forming a binary Liquidity Constraint (LC) variable. The framework integrates (i) high-performance tabular prediction models, including gradient-boosted decision trees and neural tabular networks, to construct calibrated probability-of-vulnerability scores; (ii) explainability techniques, with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) used to quantify global and local risk drivers; and (iii) causal machine learning methods, such as Double Machine Learning (DML) and generalized random forests, to estimate the heterogeneous causal effect of liquidity constraints on financial vulnerability across income groups, city tiers, and regions. To enhance model reliability for risk governance, probability calibration and distribution-free uncertainty quantification are implemented via conformal prediction. Empirical results indicate that liquidity constraints significantly increase the predicted and causally estimated risk of household financial vulnerability, with stronger effects concentrated among middle-to-lower income households and households located in lower-tier cities and economically stressed regions. The proposed framework provides an algorithmic basis for targeted inclusive-finance interventions and household risk mitigation policies.

KEYWORDS

Household finance; Financial risk management; Liquidity constraint; Financial Vulnerability Index; Machine learning; Explainable artificial intelligence; Double Machine Learning; Conformal prediction; China Household Finance Survey

CITE THIS PAPER

Xiaoyu Wang. Liquidity Constraints and Household Financial Vulnerability in China: An Explainable, Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning Risk Management Framework Using the China Household Finance Survey. Information Systems and Economics (2026) Vol. 7: 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infse.2026.070101.

REFERENCES

[1] C. Midões, M. Seré, "Living with Reduced Income: An Analysis of Household Financial Vulnerability under COVID-19," Social Indicators Research, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 125–149, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02811-7. 
[2] R. Cifuentes, P. Margaretic, T. Saavedra, "Measuring households' financial vulnerabilities from consumer debt: Evidence from Chile," Emerging Markets Review, vol. 43, Art. 100677, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100677. 
[3] C. Boar, D. Gorea, V. Midrigan, "Liquidity Constraints in the U.S. Housing Market," The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1120–1154, 2022, doi: 10.1093/restud/rdab063. 
[4] N. Bussmann, P. Giudici, D. Marinelli, J. Papenbrock, "Explainable Machine Learning in Credit Risk Management," Computational Economics, vol. 57, pp. 203–216, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10614-020-10042-0. 
[5] A. N. Angelopoulos, S. Bates, A. Fisch, L. Lei, T. Schuster, "Conformal Risk Control," in Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.02814. 
[6] B. Baugh, I. Ben-David, H. Park, J. A. Parker, "Asymmetric Consumption Smoothing," American Economic Review, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 192–230, 2021, doi: 10.1257/aer.20181735. 
[7] S. Catherine, M. Miller, N. Sarin, "Relaxing household liquidity constraints through social security," Journal of Public Economics, vol. 189, Art. 104243, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104243. 
[8] R. L. Clark, A. Lusardi, O. S. Mitchell, "Financial Fragility during the COVID-19 Pandemic," AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol. 111, pp. 292–296, 2021, doi: 10.1257/pandp.20211000. 
[9] F. Donou-Adonsou, N. Leslie-Piper, "BNPL and financial fragility in U.S. households," Finance Research Letters, vol. 86, Art. 108423, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108423. 
[10] M. Toussaint-Comeau, “Liquidity constraints and debts: Implications for the saving behavior of the middle class,” Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 479–493, 2021, doi: 10.1111/coep.12521. 
[11] P. E. de Lange, B. Melsom, C. B. Vennerød, S. Westgaard, "Explainable AI for Credit Assessment in Banks," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, no. 12, Art. 556, 2022, doi: 10.3390/jrfm15120556. 
[12] M. K. Nallakaruppan, B. Balusamy, M. Lawanya Shri, V. Malathi, S. Bhattacharyya, "An Explainable AI framework for credit evaluation and analysis," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 153, Art. 111307, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111307. 
[13] Y. Gorishniy, I. Rubachev, V. Khrulkov, A. Babenko, "Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021), pp. 18932–18943, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.11959. 
[14] F. M. Ojeda, M. L. Jansen, A. Thiéry, S. Blankenberg, C. Weimar, M. Schmid, A. Ziegler, "Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A comprehensive comparison," Statistics in Medicine, vol. 42, no. 29, pp. 5451–5478, 2023, doi: 10.1002/sim.9921. 
[15] M. Yang, X. Bi, "Cost-Aware Calibration of Classifiers," INFORMS Journal on Data Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–113, 2025, doi: 10.1287/ijds.2024.0038.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics